[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200424190422.GA5220@kunai>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 21:04:22 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Tim Gover <tim.gover@...pberrypi.com>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/91] i2c: brcmstb: Allow to compile it on BCM2835
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:07:25AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 4/24/2020 9:13 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> >> config I2C_BRCMSTB
> >> tristate "BRCM Settop/DSL I2C controller"
> >> - depends on ARCH_BRCMSTB || BMIPS_GENERIC || ARCH_BCM_63XX || \
> >> - COMPILE_TEST
> >> + depends on ARCH_BCM2835 || ARCH_BRCMSTB || BMIPS_GENERIC || \
> >> + ARCH_BCM_63XX || COMPILE_TEST
> >
> > Isn't there something like ARCH_BROADCOM which we could use here instead
> > of adding each and every SoC?
>
> If you are worried about this list growing bigger, I do not think this
> is going to happen beyond this changeset (famous last words).
Okay, thanks for the heads up.
I wonder, then, if the description after 'tristate' is still accurate?
But that withstanding, I am fine with this patch:
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Let me know if I shall take this via I2C.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists