[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200424202505.29562-5-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:24:57 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, ohad@...ery.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...com
Cc: loic.pallardy@...com, arnaud.pouliquen@...com,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/12] remoteproc: stm32: Remove memory translation from DT parsing
Other than one has to be done after the other, there is no correlation
between memory translation and DT parsing. As move function
stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations() to stm32_rproc_probe() so that
stm32_rproc_parse_dt() can be extended to look for synchronisation
related binding in a clean way.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 57a426ea620b..658439d4b00a 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
*auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
- return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
+ return 0;
}
static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -634,6 +634,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
goto free_rproc;
+ ret = stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
+ if (ret)
+ goto free_rproc;
+
rproc->auto_boot = auto_boot;
rproc->has_iommu = false;
ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists