linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9b0fe1ba-4db5-dfc9-3b7f-28e8b65430df@suse.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Apr 2020 13:17:10 +0800
From:   Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
To:     <dsterba@...e.cz>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree



On 2020/4/23 上午5:29, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:25:20AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> After merging the btrfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
>> Caused by commit
>>
>>   8d80a063d508 ("btrfs: move on-disk structure definitions to btrfs_tree.h")
>>
>> They should probably all be __u8 ...
>>
>> I have applied the following patch for today.
> 
> I've removed the patch from the for-next branch.
> 
BTW, do I need to update the patch, or just move btrfs_tree.h to fs/btrfs?

Thanks,
Qu