[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200424054837.5138-2-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:48:33 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, maz@...nel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
will@...nel.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
dave@...olabs.net, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] rcuwait: Fix stale wake call name in comment
The 'trywake' name was renamed to simply 'wake', update the comment.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
---
kernel/exit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 389a88cb3081..9f9015f3f6b0 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w)
/*
* Order condition vs @task, such that everything prior to the load
* of @task is visible. This is the condition as to why the user called
- * rcuwait_trywake() in the first place. Pairs with set_current_state()
+ * rcuwait_wake() in the first place. Pairs with set_current_state()
* barrier (A) in rcuwait_wait_event().
*
* WAIT WAKE
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists