[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200424061529.GA23303@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:15:29 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...gle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: Limit number of items taken from the I/O
scheduler in one go
> index 74cedea56034..b69b780351c1 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -84,12 +84,17 @@ void blk_mq_sched_restart(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> * Only SCSI implements .get_budget and .put_budget, and SCSI restarts
> * its queue by itself in its completion handler, so we don't need to
> * restart queue if .get_budget() returns BLK_STS_NO_RESOURCE.
> + *
> + * Returns true if hctx->dispatch was found non-empty and
> + * run_work has to be run again. This is necessary to avoid
> + * starving flushes.
> */
Please use up all 80 chars for your comments (just like the existing
part of the comment).
> * Only SCSI implements .get_budget and .put_budget, and SCSI restarts
> * its queue by itself in its completion handler, so we don't need to
> * restart queue if .get_budget() returns BLK_STS_NO_RESOURCE.
> + *
> + * Returns true if hctx->dispatch was found non-empty and
> + * run_work has to be run again. This is necessary to avoid
> + * starving flushes.
Same here.
> +again:
> + run_again = false;
> +
> /*
> * If we have previous entries on our dispatch list, grab them first for
> * more fair dispatch.
> @@ -208,19 +236,28 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
> if (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false)) {
> if (has_sched_dispatch)
> - blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
> + run_again = blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
> else
> - blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
> + run_again = blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
> }
> } else if (has_sched_dispatch) {
> - blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
> + run_again = blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
> } else if (hctx->dispatch_busy) {
> /* dequeue request one by one from sw queue if queue is busy */
> - blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
> + run_again = blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
> } else {
> blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &rq_list);
> blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false);
> }
> +
> + if (run_again) {
> + if (!restarted) {
> + restarted = true;
> + goto again;
> + }
> +
> + blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
> + }
This is a weird loop. I'd split the code betweem the again label and
the run_again check here into a __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests
helper, and then you can do:
if (__blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests()) {
if (__blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests())
blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
}
here. Preferably with ha good comment explaining the logic.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists