[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200424092125.GA13069@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:21:25 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Tim Waugh <tim@...erelk.net>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] isofs: stop using ioctl_by_bdev
On Fri 24-04-20 08:52:53, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 01:03:47PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > There's no error handling in the caller and this function actually returns
> > unsigned int... So I believe you need to return 0 here to maintain previous
> > behavior (however suspicious it may be)?
>
> Indeed, and I don't think it is suspicious at all - if we have no CDROM
> info we should assume session 0, which is the same as for non-CDROM
> devices. Fixed for the next version.
Right, I've realized that once I've checked UDF version and thought about
it for a while...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists