lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200424105053.GC8414@dell>
Date:   Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:50:53 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc:     Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com>,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, tony@...mide.com,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mfd: stm32-fmc2: add STM32 FMC2 controller
 driver

On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Marek Vasut wrote:

> On 4/24/20 9:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Apr 2020, Christophe Kerello wrote:
> > 
> >> The driver adds the support for the STMicroelectronics FMC2 controller
> >> found on STM32MP SOCs.
> >>
> >> The FMC2 functional block makes the interface with: synchronous and
> >> asynchronous static memories (such as PSNOR, PSRAM or other
> >> memory-mapped peripherals) and NAND flash memories.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes in v2:
> >>  - remove ops from stm32_fmc2 structure
> >>  - add 2 APIs to manage FMC2 enable/disable
> >>  - add 2 APIs to manage FMC2 NWAIT shared signal
> >>
> >>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig            |  12 +++
> >>  drivers/mfd/Makefile           |   1 +
> >>  drivers/mfd/stm32-fmc2.c       | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  include/linux/mfd/stm32-fmc2.h | 225 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  4 files changed, 374 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stm32-fmc2.c
> >>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stm32-fmc2.h
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> >> index 2b20329..5260582 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> >> @@ -1922,6 +1922,18 @@ config MFD_ROHM_BD71828
> >>  	  Also included is a Coulomb counter, a real-time clock (RTC), and
> >>  	  a 32.768 kHz clock gate.
> >>  
> >> +config MFD_STM32_FMC2
> >> +	tristate "Support for FMC2 controllers on STM32MP SoCs"
> >> +	depends on MACH_STM32MP157 || COMPILE_TEST
> >> +	select MFD_CORE
> >> +	select REGMAP
> >> +	select REGMAP_MMIO
> >> +	help
> >> +	  Select this option to enable STM32 FMC2 driver used for FMC2 External
> >> +	  Bus Interface controller and FMC2 NAND flash controller. This driver
> >> +	  provides core support for the STM32 FMC2 controllers, in order to use
> >> +	  the actual functionality of the device other drivers must be enabled.
> > 
> > Not sure how many times I have to say this before people stop
> > attempting to pass these kinds of relationships off as MFDs:
> > 
> > A memory device and its bus is not an MFD.  In a similar vain to the
> > thousands of USB, I2C, SPI, PCI and the like devices that aren't MFDs
> > either.
> > 
> > Please find another way to associate your device with its bus.
> 
> This FMC2 is however an IP which can either operate external devices
> (like ethernet chip on this parallel bus) or external flashes (like NOR
> and NAND chips).

I'm sure that it *can*.  Although that's not its main purpose.  The
clue is in the nomenclature ("Flexible *Memory* Controller").  Nor is
it how the device is being used in this submission:

  "The FMC2 functional block makes the interface with: synchronous and
   asynchronous static memories (such as PSNOR, PSRAM or other
   memory-mapped peripherals) and NAND flash memories."

As I mentioned, this is just another memory device and its bus.

> Can you provide a suggestion how this should be handled, if not as MFD?
> It seems to me, that this is a Multi-Function Device .

Simply move it into the MTD or Memory subsystems and set up the
dependencies via Kconfig.

> If this discussion is a recurring topic, is there some documentation
> which explains how such devices should be handled ?

Not that I'm aware of.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ