[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200424150240.6fdede81.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:02:40 +0200
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Cc: Jared Rossi <jrossi@...ux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vfio-ccw: Enable transparent CCW IPL from DASD
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:13:17 +0200
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Remove the explicit prefetch check when using vfio-ccw devices.
> > This check is not needed as all Linux channel programs are intended
> > to use prefetch and will be executed in the same way regardless.
>
> Hm... my understanding is that we have the reasonable expectation that
> our guests will always issue channel programs that work fine with
> prefetch even if the bit is not set in the orb (including CCW IPL, in
> the way it is implemented in the s390-ccw QEMU bios), and therefore
> this patch is just making things less complicated.
AFAIR the problem is not s390-ccw QEMU bios. We could easily fix that.
The practical problem is some channel programs generated by zipl that
simply fail to set the bit (although they could). That is a perfectly
legit thing to do, because the prefetch bit was originally about
performance.
Sorry I missed your mail, so complained about the same
issues.
Regards,
Halil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists