linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 11/11] net: bridge: Add checks for enabling the STP.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Apr 2020 16:20:35 +0300
From:   Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        jiri@...nulli.us, ivecera@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, olteanv@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 11/11] net: bridge: Add checks for enabling
 the STP.

On 22/04/2020 19:18, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> It is not possible to have the MRP and STP running at the same time on the
> bridge, therefore add check when enabling the STP to check if MRP is already
> enabled. In that case return error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_ioctl.c    |  3 +--
>  net/bridge/br_netlink.c  |  4 +++-
>  net/bridge/br_private.h  |  3 ++-
>  net/bridge/br_stp.c      |  6 ++++++
>  net/bridge/br_stp_if.c   | 11 ++++++++++-
>  net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c |  4 +---
>  6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c b/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c
> index ae22d784b88a..5e71fc8b826f 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c
> @@ -242,8 +242,7 @@ static int old_dev_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
>  		if (!ns_capable(dev_net(dev)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
>  			return -EPERM;
>  
> -		br_stp_set_enabled(br, args[1]);
> -		ret = 0;
> +		ret = br_stp_set_enabled(br, args[1], NULL);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case BRCTL_SET_BRIDGE_PRIORITY:
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> index 1a5e681a626a..a774e19c41bb 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> @@ -1109,7 +1109,9 @@ static int br_changelink(struct net_device *brdev, struct nlattr *tb[],
>  	if (data[IFLA_BR_STP_STATE]) {
>  		u32 stp_enabled = nla_get_u32(data[IFLA_BR_STP_STATE]);
>  
> -		br_stp_set_enabled(br, stp_enabled);
> +		err = br_stp_set_enabled(br, stp_enabled, extack);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (data[IFLA_BR_PRIORITY]) {
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index 5835828320b6..c35647cb138a 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -1283,7 +1283,8 @@ int br_set_ageing_time(struct net_bridge *br, clock_t ageing_time);
>  /* br_stp_if.c */
>  void br_stp_enable_bridge(struct net_bridge *br);
>  void br_stp_disable_bridge(struct net_bridge *br);
> -void br_stp_set_enabled(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val);
> +int br_stp_set_enabled(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val,
> +		       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>  void br_stp_enable_port(struct net_bridge_port *p);
>  void br_stp_disable_port(struct net_bridge_port *p);
>  bool br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(struct net_bridge *br);
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> index 1f14b8455345..3e88be7aa269 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ void br_set_state(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned int state)
>  	};
>  	int err;
>  
> +	/* Don't change the state of the ports if they are driven by a different
> +	 * protocol.
> +	 */
> +	if (p->flags & BR_MRP_AWARE)
> +		return;
> +
>  	p->state = state;
>  	err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
>  	if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> index d174d3a566aa..a42850b7eb9a 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> @@ -196,10 +196,17 @@ static void br_stp_stop(struct net_bridge *br)
>  	br->stp_enabled = BR_NO_STP;
>  }
>  
> -void br_stp_set_enabled(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
> +int br_stp_set_enabled(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val,
> +		       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>  {
>  	ASSERT_RTNL();
>  
> +	if (br_mrp_enabled(br)) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> +				   "STP can't be enabled if MRP is already enabled\n");

The operation could be disable (noop in case it's already disabled) and this will still
return an error.

> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (val) {
>  		if (br->stp_enabled == BR_NO_STP)
>  			br_stp_start(br);
> @@ -207,6 +214,8 @@ void br_stp_set_enabled(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
>  		if (br->stp_enabled != BR_NO_STP)
>  			br_stp_stop(br);
>  	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* called under bridge lock */
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
> index 9ab0f00b1081..7db06e3f642a 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
> @@ -126,9 +126,7 @@ static ssize_t stp_state_show(struct device *d,
>  
>  static int set_stp_state(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
>  {
> -	br_stp_set_enabled(br, val);
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return br_stp_set_enabled(br, val, NULL);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t stp_state_store(struct device *d,
>