[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200425102711.GW25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:27:11 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Florinel Iordache <florinel.iordache@....com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, kuba@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, shawnguo@...nel.org, leoyang.li@....com,
madalin.bucur@....nxp.com, ioana.ciornei@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] dt-bindings: net: add backplane dt
bindings
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 03:46:24PM +0300, Florinel Iordache wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-controller.yaml
> index ac471b6..541cee5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-controller.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-controller.yaml
> @@ -93,8 +93,9 @@ properties:
> - rxaui
> - xaui
>
> - # 10GBASE-KR, XFI, SFI
> + # 10GBASE-KR, 40GBASE-KR4, XFI, SFI
> - 10gbase-kr
> + - 40gbase-kr4
> - usxgmii
This makes a nonsense of the comment (and is actually something I failed
to update with the 10GBASE-R change).
The comment "10GBASE-KR, XFI, SFI" was there to describe _only_ the
following option, so your addition should look like:
# 10GBASE-KR, XFI, SFI
- 10gbase-kr
# 40GBASE-KR4
- 40gbase-kr4
Whereas there should also be a fix for the lack of 10GBASE-R, so it
should finally look like this:
# 10GBASE-R, XFI, SFI
- 10gbase-r
# 10GBASE-KR (10GBASE-R with backplane negotiation)
- 10gbase-kr
# 40GBASE-KR4 (...)
- 40gbase-kr4
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists