[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200425105432.GA2068247@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 12:54:32 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Suraj Upadhyay <usuraj35@...il.com>
Cc: jerome.pouiller@...abs.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: wfx: cleanup long lines in data_tx.c
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 07:18:34PM +0530, Suraj Upadhyay wrote:
> Break lines with length over 80 characters to conform
> to the linux coding style and refactor wherever necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Upadhyay <usuraj35@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Changed the temporary variable name for the memzcmp statement
> to is_used. (as suggested).
> - Added a temporary ieee80211_supported_band variable to address
> the problem in wfx_get_hw_rate() more efficiently. (not
> suggested, but still).
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Introduced a temporary variable for the memzcmp statement.
> - Addressed the checkpatch problem with wfx_get_hw_rate().
> - Restored the function definition of wfx_tx_get_tx_parms
> as suggested by the reviewer.
> - Added suggested changes for req->packet_id statement.
>
> drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c
> index 9c1a91207dd8..717155975345 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
> static int wfx_get_hw_rate(struct wfx_dev *wdev,
> const struct ieee80211_tx_rate *rate)
> {
> +
> + struct ieee80211_supported_band *band;
> if (rate->idx < 0)
checkpatch did not complain about this change?
It should have...
Please fix that up.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists