linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] block: put_device() if device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d8e01420-5a0a-3c60-0b8c-46465437e255@acm.org>
Date:   Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:58:23 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        jack@...e.cz, ming.lei@...hat.com, nstange@...e.de,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com, yukuai3@...wei.com,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] block: put_device() if device_add() fails

On 2020-04-24 15:32, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 04:40:45PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 4/19/20 12:45 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>>> Through code inspection I've found that we don't put_device() if
>>> device_add() fails, and this must be done to decrement its refcount.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
> 
> Turns out this is wrong, as bdi needs it still, we have can only remove
> it once all users are done, which should be at the disk_release() path.
> 
> I've found this while adding the errors paths missing.

Hi Luis,

I had a look at the comments above device_add() before I added my
Reviewed-by. Now that I've had another look at these comments and also
at the device_add() implementation I agree that we don't need this patch.

Bart.