[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vez8wSaYHbXmvfXUS5N+vScQqHGg055DNKrEnCunP7awA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 21:52:25 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Tomasz Duszynski <tomasz.duszynski@...akon.com>
Cc: linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] iio: chemical: scd30: add core driver
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 9:42 PM Tomasz Duszynski
<tomasz.duszynski@...akon.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 02:43:35PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:05 PM Tomasz Duszynski
> > <tomasz.duszynski@...akon.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:49:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 5:22 PM Tomasz Duszynski
> > > > <tomasz.duszynski@...akon.com> wrote:
...
> > > As for ABI that's in
> > > a separate patch.
> >
> > It's not good from bisectability point of view. If by some reason this
> > patch or documentation patch gets reverted, the other one will be
> > dangling.
> > Please, unify them.
> >
>
> Huh? Reverting core and leaving leftovers would be wrong and pointless.
Exactly my point why it should be one patch. To secure impossibility
to do pointless reverts.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists