[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACG_h5pVEQ8+LGogWo4Ea+8OcRz1edudJPWL8SytGdaAc8xabw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 01:24:18 +0530
From: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
bgolaszewski@...libre.com, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
rui.zhang@...el.com, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
amit.kucheria@...durent.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] gpio: thermal: Utilize for_each_set_clump macro
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 12:56 AM Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 12:35:02AM +0530, Syed Nayyar Waris wrote:
> > This patch replaces all the existing for_each_set_clump8 and related
> > function calls in the drivers (gpio and thermal) with the equivalent
> > new generic for_each_set_clump macro.
>
> Why are patches [3/6] and [4/6] included in v2 even though William
> said they should be ignored?
>
> Again, replacing for_each_set_clump8() with for_each_set_clump()
> does not provide any benefit but may impact performance and makes
> the code more difficult to follow. So once more, please do not
> change drivers which are known to work fine with 8 bit clumps,
> specifically gpio-max3191x.c and gpio-74x164.c.
>
> Please in the future include a list of the changes you've made
> in the cover letter, not just in each individual patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lukas
Hi Lukas,
Your concerns are noted. [3/6] and [4/6] won't be included in the next
version v3 of the patchset.
Regards
Syed Nayyar Waris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists