lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 25 Apr 2020 15:11:36 -0700
From:   Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        <jonathanh@...dia.com>, <frankc@...dia.com>, <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        <sakari.ailus@....fi>, <helen.koike@...labora.com>
CC:     <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v10 6/9] media: tegra: Add Tegra210 Video input driver


On 4/25/20 3:08 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> 25.04.2020 01:00, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>> On 4/24/20 8:07 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>
>>>
>>> 24.04.2020 06:55, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>
>>> Is this driver compiled as a single kernel module file?
>>>
>>>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>");
>>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NVIDIA Tegra CSI Device Driver");
>>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>> ...
>>>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>");
>>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NVIDIA Tegra Video Input Device Driver");
>>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>> I don't think that these macros are needed in that case.
>>> The video.c should be enough, isn't it?
>> yes these can be removed
> It will be nice to factor out the Tegra210-specific VI/CSI OPS into a
> separate driver module (say tegra210-vi) to ease supporting of other
> Tegra versions. Of course this could be done later on, although I
> suppose the amount of hassle could be reduced if it's done from the start.
vi/csi.c are common drivers for all Tegras. All Tegra chip specific 
related programming for both vi and csi were already moved to Tegra210.c 
based on prior feedbacks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ