[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200425075906.GA5250@lst.de>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 09:59:06 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: yuyufen@...wei.com, tj@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
bvanassche@....org, tytso@....edu, hdegoede@...hat.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bdi: fix use-after-free for dev_name(bdi->dev) v3
Any more comments? Are we ready to merge this now?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:38:42AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the first three patches are my take on the proposal from Yufen Yu
> to fix the use after free of the device name of the bdi device.
>
> The rest is vaguely related cleanups.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - switch vboxsf to a shorter bdi name
>
> Changes since v1:
> - use a static dev_name buffer inside struct backing_dev_info
---end quoted text---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists