[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03426915-25ea-69b4-bc64-f87f3046d33f@nvidia.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:08:26 -0700
From: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, <frankc@...dia.com>, <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
<helen.koike@...labora.com>
CC: <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v10 6/9] media: tegra: Add Tegra210 Video input driver
On 4/25/20 5:41 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>
> On 4/25/20 5:36 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>
>> 25.04.2020 12:36, Hans Verkuil пишет:
>> ...
>>>> The media/tegra/ sounds a bit too generic, the media/tegra-vi/ path
>>>> should better reflect the driver, IMO.
>>>>
>>>> It also should be better to name the compiled kernel module as
>>>> tegra-vi,
>>>> IMO.
>>>>
>>> The driver name and the directory should be in sync, so either
>>> tegra-video
>>> or tegra-vi for both. I have no preference myself, as long as they
>>> are the
>>> same.
>>>
>>> This can be done as a follow-up patch.
>> Given that this driver isn't going to be reused by older pre-Tegra210
>> SoCs, perhaps it will also be worthwhile to name it as tegra210-vi or
>> tegra210-video.
>
> Can you explain what do you meant by can't be reused for pre-tegra210
> or for tegra186/194?
>
> support for other tegra's can be added to same tegra-video driver.
> tegra-video host1x driver can be updated to add other tegra's vi and
> csi compatibles to host1x subdevs and vi and csi driver can be updated
> to add other tegra soc data and need to add coresponding
> tegra186/194/xxx.c file with tegra specific prog sequence
>
Same tegra-video.ko can be used for all tegra soc as driver supports
adding other soc related as well.
Also was thinking instead of renaming media/tegra as media/tegra-vi,
probably we can rename as media/tegra-video so it will be inline with
module name we already chosen and also mainly we have vi and csi with in
that so instead of tegra-vi probably we can use media/tegra-video?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists