lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 26 Apr 2020 19:07:40 +0800
From:   Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
To:     palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        anup@...infault.org
Cc:     david.abdurachmanov@...ive.com, Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/sifive-plic: allow many cores to handle IRQs

Currently, driver forces the IRQs to be handled by only one core. This
patch provides the way to enable others cores to handle IRQs if needed,
so users could decide how many cores they wanted on default by boot
argument.

Use 'irqaffinity' boot argument to determine affinity. If there is no
irqaffinity in dts or kernel configuration, use irq default affinity,
so all harts would try to claim IRQ.

For example, add irqaffinity=0 in chosen node to set irq affinity to
hart 0. It also supports more than one harts to handle irq, such as set
irqaffinity=0,3,4.

You can change IRQ affinity from user-space using procfs. For example,
you can make CPU0 and CPU2 serve IRQ together by the following command:

echo 4 > /proc/irq/<x>/smp_affinity

Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 21 +++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
index d0a71febdadc..bc1440d54185 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
@@ -111,15 +111,12 @@ static inline void plic_irq_toggle(const struct cpumask *mask,
 static void plic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
 {
 	struct cpumask amask;
-	unsigned int cpu;
 	struct plic_priv *priv = irq_get_chip_data(d->irq);
 
 	cpumask_and(&amask, &priv->lmask, cpu_online_mask);
-	cpu = cpumask_any_and(irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d),
-					   &amask);
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids))
-		return;
-	plic_irq_toggle(cpumask_of(cpu), d, 1);
+	cpumask_and(&amask, &amask, irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d));
+
+	plic_irq_toggle(&amask, d, 1);
 }
 
 static void plic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -133,24 +130,20 @@ static void plic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
 static int plic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
 			     const struct cpumask *mask_val, bool force)
 {
-	unsigned int cpu;
 	struct cpumask amask;
 	struct plic_priv *priv = irq_get_chip_data(d->irq);
 
 	cpumask_and(&amask, &priv->lmask, mask_val);
 
 	if (force)
-		cpu = cpumask_first(&amask);
+		cpumask_copy(&amask, mask_val);
 	else
-		cpu = cpumask_any_and(&amask, cpu_online_mask);
-
-	if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-		return -EINVAL;
+		cpumask_and(&amask, &amask, cpu_online_mask);
 
 	plic_irq_toggle(&priv->lmask, d, 0);
-	plic_irq_toggle(cpumask_of(cpu), d, 1);
+	plic_irq_toggle(&amask, d, 1);
 
-	irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
+	irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, &amask);
 
 	return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
 }
-- 
2.26.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ