[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4JNE9Q.Y5HBZ952XKLI@crapouillou.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 19:06:40 +0200
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, od@...c.me,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] PM: introduce pm_ptr() macro
Hi Rafael,
Le dim. 26 avril 2020 à 17:40, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> a
écrit :
> On Monday, April 13, 2020 2:32:05 PM CEST Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> This macro is analogous to the infamous of_match_ptr(). If CONFIG_PM
>> is enabled, this macro will resolve to its argument, otherwise to
>> NULL.
>
> Well, this is going to result in quite a bit of unused code being
> added to the kernels built with CONFIG_PM unset.
>
> Is there any way to avoid that somehow?
Using __maybe_unused on the dev_pm_ops struct and the callbacks, as
long as they are static, they should be dropped by the compiler when
CONFIG_PM is not set.
-Paul
>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> v2: Remove pm_sleep_ptr() macro
>>
>> include/linux/pm.h | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
>> index e057d1fa2469..1c0eec06905d 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
>> @@ -374,6 +374,12 @@ const struct dev_pm_ops name = { \
>> SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn, idle_fn) \
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +#define pm_ptr(_ptr) (_ptr)
>> +#else
>> +#define pm_ptr(_ptr) NULL
>> +#endif
>> +
>> /*
>> * PM_EVENT_ messages
>> *
>>
>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists