[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200426222054.GA2005@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:20:54 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ud.ionos.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, willy@...radead.org, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] btrfs: use set/clear_fs_page_private
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:49:19PM +0200, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> Since the new pair function is introduced, we can call them to clean the
> code in btrfs.
>
> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
> Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
> Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ud.ionos.com>
....
> void set_page_extent_mapped(struct page *page)
> {
> - if (!PagePrivate(page)) {
> - SetPagePrivate(page);
> - get_page(page);
> - set_page_private(page, EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE);
> - }
> + if (!PagePrivate(page))
> + set_fs_page_private(page, (void *)EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE);
Change the definition of EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE so the cast is not
needed? Nothing ever reads EXTENT_PAGE_PRIVATE; it's only there to
set the private flag for other code to check and release the extent
mapping reference to the page...
> @@ -8331,11 +8328,9 @@ static int btrfs_migratepage(struct address_space *mapping,
>
> if (page_has_private(page)) {
> ClearPagePrivate(page);
> - get_page(newpage);
> - set_page_private(newpage, page_private(page));
> + set_fs_page_private(newpage, (void *)page_private(page));
> set_page_private(page, 0);
> put_page(page);
> - SetPagePrivate(newpage);
> }
This is just:
set_fs_page_private(newpage, clear_fs_page_private(page));
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists