[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200427183656.GO14870@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:36:56 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Haiwei Li <lihaiwei@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: X86: Introduce need_cancel_enter_guest helper
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 10:05:00AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 14:23, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> >
> > Introduce need_cancel_enter_guest() helper, we need to check some
> > conditions before doing CONT_RUN, in addition, it can also catch
> > the case vmexit occurred while another event was being delivered
> > to guest software since vmx_complete_interrupts() adds the request
> > bit.
> >
> > Tested-by: Haiwei Li <lihaiwei@...cent.com>
> > Cc: Haiwei Li <lihaiwei@...cent.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > index f1f6638..5c21027 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > @@ -6577,7 +6577,7 @@ bool __vmx_vcpu_run(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, unsigned long *regs, bool launched);
> >
> > static enum exit_fastpath_completion vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > - enum exit_fastpath_completion exit_fastpath;
> > + enum exit_fastpath_completion exit_fastpath = EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE;
> > struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> > unsigned long cr3, cr4;
> >
> > @@ -6754,10 +6754,12 @@ static enum exit_fastpath_completion vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > vmx_recover_nmi_blocking(vmx);
> > vmx_complete_interrupts(vmx);
> >
> > - exit_fastpath = vmx_exit_handlers_fastpath(vcpu);
> > - /* static call is better with retpolines */
> > - if (exit_fastpath == EXIT_FASTPATH_CONT_RUN)
> > - goto cont_run;
> > + if (!kvm_need_cancel_enter_guest(vcpu)) {
> > + exit_fastpath = vmx_exit_handlers_fastpath(vcpu);
> > + /* static call is better with retpolines */
> > + if (exit_fastpath == EXIT_FASTPATH_CONT_RUN)
> > + goto cont_run;
> > + }
>
> The kvm_need_cancel_enter_guest() should not before
> vmx_exit_handlers_fastpath() which will break IPI fastpath. How about
> applying something like below, otherwise, maybe introduce another
> EXIT_FASTPATH_CONT_FAIL to indicate fails due to
> kvm_need_cancel_enter_guest() if checking it after
> vmx_exit_handlers_fastpath(), then we return 1 in vmx_handle_exit()
> directly instead of kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(). VMX-preemption
> timer exit doesn't need to skip emulated instruction but wrmsr
> TSCDEADLINE MSR exit does which results in a little complex here.
>
> Paolo, what do you think?
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 853d3af..9317924 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -6564,6 +6564,9 @@ static enum exit_fastpath_completion
> handle_fastpath_preemption_timer(struct kvm
> {
> struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
>
> + if (kvm_need_cancel_enter_guest(vcpu))
> + return EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE;
> +
> if (!vmx->req_immediate_exit &&
> !unlikely(vmx->loaded_vmcs->hv_timer_soft_disabled)) {
> kvm_lapic_expired_hv_timer(vcpu);
> @@ -6771,12 +6774,10 @@ static enum exit_fastpath_completion
> vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vmx_recover_nmi_blocking(vmx);
> vmx_complete_interrupts(vmx);
>
> - if (!(kvm_need_cancel_enter_guest(vcpu))) {
> - exit_fastpath = vmx_exit_handlers_fastpath(vcpu);
> - if (exit_fastpath == EXIT_FASTPATH_CONT_RUN) {
> - vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(vcpu);
> - goto cont_run;
> - }
> + exit_fastpath = vmx_exit_handlers_fastpath(vcpu);
> + if (exit_fastpath == EXIT_FASTPATH_CONT_RUN) {
Relying on the handlers to check kvm_need_cancel_enter_guest() will be
error prone and costly to maintain. I also don't like that it buries the
logic.
What about adding another flavor, e.g.:
exit_fastpath = vmx_exit_handlers_fastpath(vcpu);
if (exit_fastpath == EXIT_FASTPATH_CONT_RUN &&
kvm_need_cancel_enter_guest(vcpu))
exit_fastpath = EXIT_FASTPATH_NOP;
That would also allow you to enable preemption timer without first having
to add CONT_RUN, which would be a very good thing for bisection.
> + vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(vcpu);
> + goto cont_run;
> }
>
> return exit_fastpath;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 99061ba..11b309c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1618,6 +1618,9 @@ static int
> handle_fastpath_set_x2apic_icr_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data
>
> static int handle_fastpath_set_tscdeadline(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data)
> {
> + if (kvm_need_cancel_enter_guest(vcpu))
> + return 1;
> +
> if (!kvm_x86_ops.set_hv_timer ||
> kvm_mwait_in_guest(vcpu->kvm) ||
> kvm_can_post_timer_interrupt(vcpu))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists