linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: lpddr: Replace printk with pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d036dbad02241fdeb0a6400896f73ff11e98e53b.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:01:03 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: lpddr: Replace printk with pr_notice

On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 14:03 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> pr_notice is preferred over printk.

So is coalescing formats

? diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
[]
> @@ -127,31 +127,31 @@ static inline void print_drs_error(unsigned dsr)
>  	int prog_status = (dsr & DSR_RPS) >> 8;
>  
>  	if (!(dsr & DSR_AVAILABLE))
> -		printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> +		pr_notice("DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
>  	if ((prog_status & 0x03) == 0x03)
> -		printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
> +		pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
>  						"half with 41h command\n");

		pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid half with 41h command\n");

etc...