[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c324eed2e6c76fd0157969c69e463e7e7b9ba144.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:15:02 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: lpddr: Replace printk with pr_notice
On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 14:10 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
> On 4/27/20 14:01, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 14:03 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > pr_notice is preferred over printk.
> >
> > So is coalescing formats
> >
> > ? diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
> > []
> > > @@ -127,31 +127,31 @@ static inline void print_drs_error(unsigned dsr)
> > > int prog_status = (dsr & DSR_RPS) >> 8;
> > >
> > > if (!(dsr & DSR_AVAILABLE))
> > > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> > > + pr_notice("DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> > > if ((prog_status & 0x03) == 0x03)
> > > - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
> > > + pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
> > > "half with 41h command\n");
> >
> > pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid half with 41h command\n");
> >
>
> I didn't want to mess with the rest of format, because some maintainers
> don't like that. If Miquel is OK with that, I can fix that up, too.
He should. Coalescing is part of coding-style.
"never break user-visible strings such as printk messages"
cheers, Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists