[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200427122606.dc29c381f6da47831a40d365@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:26:06 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/gup.c: Updating the documentation
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 00:23:50 +0530 Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com> wrote:
> This patch is an attempt to update the documentation.
>
> * Adding / removing extra * based on type of function
> static / global.
I don't think so, unless this is a new kerneldoc convention?
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ static struct page *follow_p4d_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> return follow_pud_mask(vma, address, p4d, flags, ctx);
> }
>
> -/**
> +/*
> * follow_page_mask - look up a page descriptor from a user-virtual address
> * @vma: vm_area_struct mapping @address
> * @address: virtual address to look up
/** indicates that the comment is in kerneldoc form, not that it has
static scope?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists