linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] platform/x86: Add Slim Bootloader firmware update support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <01620c87bb6aa7870854ae1e23ec7bd379a058de.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:57:05 -0700
From:   Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@...el.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        maurice.ma@...el.com, ravi.p.rangarajan@...el.com,
        Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...el.com>,
        kuo-lang.tseng@...el.com, jithu.joseph@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] platform/x86: Add Slim Bootloader firmware
 update support

On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 13:03 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> 
> We use a bit different template for module names
> 
> vendor-...-wmi
> 
> (yes, with exception to TBT)
> 
> I would like to rename sbl_fwu_wmi to something like this:
> 
> intel-wmi-sbl-fw-update
> 
> What do you think?

Yes I think it is better to rename this driver to intel-wmi-sbl-fw-
update as you suggested, given many drivers follow vendor-wmi-*
pattern. Thanks for pointing this out.

I will send v3 which addresses this.

Thanks
Jithu