lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:57:05 -0700 From: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@...el.com> To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>, Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, maurice.ma@...el.com, ravi.p.rangarajan@...el.com, Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...el.com>, kuo-lang.tseng@...el.com, jithu.joseph@...el.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] platform/x86: Add Slim Bootloader firmware update support On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 13:03 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > We use a bit different template for module names > > vendor-...-wmi > > (yes, with exception to TBT) > > I would like to rename sbl_fwu_wmi to something like this: > > intel-wmi-sbl-fw-update > > What do you think? Yes I think it is better to rename this driver to intel-wmi-sbl-fw- update as you suggested, given many drivers follow vendor-wmi-* pattern. Thanks for pointing this out. I will send v3 which addresses this. Thanks Jithu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists