[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjSM9mgsDuX=ZTy2L+S7wGrxZMcBn054As_Jyv8FQvcvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:27:40 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] rculist: Add hlist_swap_before_rcu
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 7:32 AM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> Would hlists_swap_heads_rcu be noticably better?
Edited out most of the rest because I think we're in agreement and
it's not a huge deal.
And yes, I think it might be nice to just call it "swap_heads()" and
make the naming match what the user wants, so that people who don't
care about the implementation can just guess from the function name.
But I also think that by now it's mostly bikeshedding, and I'm
probably also now biased by the fact that I have looked at that code
and read your explanations so it's all fresh in my mind.
A year from now, when I've forgotten the details, who knows which part
I'd find confusing? ;)
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists