[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200427102910.b6iysyumiz5pj4sv@e107158-lin>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:29:11 +0100
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Todd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "cpu/hotplug: Ignore pm_wakeup_pending() for
disable_nonboot_cpus()"
On 04/26/20 17:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I would do this the other way around:
>
> 1. Make x86 call freeze_secondary_cpus() directly, rename
> enable_nonboot_cpus() and drop disable_nonboot_cpus().
All of this in a single patch?
> 2. Get rid of __freeze_secondary_cpus().
I guess you're implying to drop the revert too and manually unroll it instead.
Could do.
Thanks
--
Qais Yousef
Powered by blists - more mailing lists