[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <217c0c14-f4fb-7321-9f57-205df0cd01fe@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:10:25 +0300
From: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-main.dtsi: Add DSS node
On 27/04/2020 13:51, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 27/04/2020 13:37, Jyri Sarha wrote:
>> On 27/04/2020 13:09, Tero Kristo wrote:
>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>
>>> Again, why disabled by default?
>>>
>>
>> tidss device is not functional without a defined video-port. The driver
>> is not implemented in a way that it would handle a broken configuration
>> gracefully.
>
> Then we need to fix it. The driver should handle the case where there
> are no ports defined just fine.
>
Just by reading the code, I would say that currently the probe would
fail with returned -ENOMEM after calling drm_vblank_init() with zero CRTCs.
So should the probe fail gracefully and silently, or should we try to
register a DRM device with no CRTCs? Is that even possible?
BR,
Jyri
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists