lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:18:44 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Marian-Cristian Rotariu 
        <marian-cristian.rotariu.rb@...renesas.com>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Add RZ/G1H support.

Hi Prabhakar,

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:31 PM Lad, Prabhakar
<prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:28 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:41 PM Lad Prabhakar
> > <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > > This patch series aims to add support for Renesas RZ/G1H (r8a7742) SoC.
> > >
> > > RZ/G1H SoC is similar to R-Car Gen2 H2 SoC.
> > >
> > > This patch set is based on renesas-drivers/master-v5.7-rc1.
> >
> > Thanks for your series!
> >
> > Looks mostly OK to me.
> Thank you for the review. After fixing patch 8/10 shall I just post a
> v2 with a single patch or the entire series ?

A single v2 patch is fine.  The clock driver goes in through a different
tree anyway/

> > The missing code part seems to be the introduction of the main
> > CONFIG_ARCH_R8A7742 symbol?
> >
> I was planning to post them once these patches were reviewed, just
> didn't wanted to flood with too many patches.
>
> for enabling r8a7742 SoC in multi_v7_defconfig should this be only
> sent out wen its accepted in shmobile_defconfig or can it be part of
> same series as below ?
>
> 05ba50a4cf99 ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable r8a7742 SoC
> 99b69d08729a ARM: shmobile: defconfig: Enable r8a7742 SoC
> 6b7bcd6635c7 ARM: debug-ll: Add support for r8a7742
> 1cf4e52e3a0e soc: renesas: Add Renesas R8A7742 config option

It can be part of the same series.

> > I assume you plan to submit the DTS for v5.8, too, so I'll have to be
> > careful and apply the binding definitions to a separate shared branch?
> >
> Yes I do plan to submit the DTS changes for v5.8.

Thanks. Looking forward to it!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ