linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 11/16] gpio: add support for the sl28cpld GPIO controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87k121qhj7.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:45:00 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/16] gpio: add support for the sl28cpld GPIO controller

Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> writes:
> +struct sl28cpld_gpio {
> +	struct regmap_irq_chip irq_chip;
> +	struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_irq sl28cpld_gpio_irqs[] = {
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG_LINE(0, 8),
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG_LINE(1, 8),
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG_LINE(2, 8),
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG_LINE(3, 8),
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG_LINE(4, 8),
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG_LINE(5, 8),
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG_LINE(6, 8),
> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG_LINE(7, 8),
> +};

This is exactly the same as the one in the irq chip patch.

> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_irq_init(struct device *dev,
> +				  struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio,
> +				  struct regmap *regmap, unsigned int base,
> +				  int irq)
> +{
> +	struct regmap_irq_chip *irq_chip = &gpio->irq_chip;
> +
> +	irq_chip->name = "sl28cpld-gpio-irq",
> +	irq_chip->irqs = sl28cpld_gpio_irqs;
> +	irq_chip->num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(sl28cpld_gpio_irqs);
> +	irq_chip->num_regs = 1;
> +	irq_chip->status_base = base + GPIO_REG_IP;
> +	irq_chip->mask_base = base + GPIO_REG_IE;
> +	irq_chip->mask_invert = true,
> +	irq_chip->ack_base = base + GPIO_REG_IP;
> +
> +	return devm_regmap_add_irq_chip_np(dev, dev_of_node(dev), regmap,
> +					   irq, IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_ONESHOT, 0,
> +					   irq_chip, &gpio->irq_data);
> +}

And this looks pretty familiar as well. What's the point of duplicating
that code?

Thanks,

        tglx