[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200427125517.GF13640@mellanox.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:55:17 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"megha.dey@...ux.intel.com" <megha.dey@...ux.intel.com>,
"maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "Lu, Baolu" <baolu.lu@...el.com>,
"Kumar, Sanjay K" <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Lin, Jing" <jing.lin@...el.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"parav@...lanox.com" <parav@...lanox.com>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Add VFIO mediated device support and IMS
support for the idxd driver.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:13:33PM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> Then back to this context. Almost every newly-born Linux VMM
> (firecracker, crosvm, cloud hypervisor, and some proprietary
> implementations) support only two types of devices: virtio and
> vfio, because they want to be simple and slim.
For security. Moving all the sketchy emulation code into the kernel
seems like a worse security posture over all :(
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists