[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200427043514.16144-4-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:35:10 +0800
From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: pbonzini@...hat.com, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, paulus@...abs.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com,
cohuck@...hat.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, maz@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
christoffer.dall@....com, peterx@...hat.com, thuth@...hat.com,
chenhuacai@...il.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/7] KVM: PPC: Remove redundant kvm_run from vcpu_arch
The 'kvm_run' field already exists in the 'vcpu' structure, which
is the same structure as the 'kvm_run' in the 'vcpu_arch' and
should be deleted.
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 6 ++----
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c | 3 +--
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 1dc63101ffe1..2745ff8faa01 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -795,7 +795,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
struct mmio_hpte_cache_entry *pgfault_cache;
struct task_struct *run_task;
- struct kvm_run *kvm_run;
spinlock_t vpa_update_lock;
struct kvmppc_vpa vpa;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 93493f0cbfe8..413ea2dcb10c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -2934,7 +2934,7 @@ static void post_guest_process(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc, bool is_master)
ret = RESUME_GUEST;
if (vcpu->arch.trap)
- ret = kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(vcpu->arch.kvm_run, vcpu,
+ ret = kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(vcpu->run, vcpu,
vcpu->arch.run_task);
vcpu->arch.ret = ret;
@@ -3920,7 +3920,6 @@ static int kvmppc_run_vcpu(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
spin_lock(&vc->lock);
vcpu->arch.ceded = 0;
vcpu->arch.run_task = current;
- vcpu->arch.kvm_run = kvm_run;
vcpu->arch.stolen_logged = vcore_stolen_time(vc, mftb());
vcpu->arch.state = KVMPPC_VCPU_RUNNABLE;
vcpu->arch.busy_preempt = TB_NIL;
@@ -3973,7 +3972,7 @@ static int kvmppc_run_vcpu(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (signal_pending(v->arch.run_task)) {
kvmppc_remove_runnable(vc, v);
v->stat.signal_exits++;
- v->arch.kvm_run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR;
+ v->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTR;
v->arch.ret = -EINTR;
wake_up(&v->arch.cpu_run);
}
@@ -4049,7 +4048,6 @@ int kvmhv_run_single_vcpu(struct kvm_run *kvm_run,
vc = vcpu->arch.vcore;
vcpu->arch.ceded = 0;
vcpu->arch.run_task = current;
- vcpu->arch.kvm_run = kvm_run;
vcpu->arch.stolen_logged = vcore_stolen_time(vc, mftb());
vcpu->arch.state = KVMPPC_VCPU_RUNNABLE;
vcpu->arch.busy_preempt = TB_NIL;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c
index dc97e5be76f6..5a3987f3ebf3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c
@@ -290,8 +290,7 @@ long kvmhv_enter_nested_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
r = RESUME_HOST;
break;
}
- r = kvmhv_run_single_vcpu(vcpu->arch.kvm_run, vcpu, hdec_exp,
- lpcr);
+ r = kvmhv_run_single_vcpu(vcpu->run, vcpu, hdec_exp, lpcr);
} while (is_kvmppc_resume_guest(r));
/* save L2 state for return */
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists