linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: gcc: Add missing UFS clocks for SM8150

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200427045534.GB4625@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:25:34 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: gcc: Add missing UFS clocks for SM8150

On 25-04-20, 12:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Vinod Koul (2020-04-23 21:43:11)
> > Add the missing ufs card and ufs phy clocks for SM8150. They were missed
> > in earlier addition of clock driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c
> > index 5c3dc34c955e..4354620fa12d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c
> > @@ -2881,6 +2881,45 @@ static struct clk_branch gcc_ufs_card_phy_aux_hw_ctl_clk = {
> >         },
> >  };
> >  
> > +/* external clocks so add BRANCH_HALT_SKIP */
> > +static struct clk_branch gcc_ufs_card_rx_symbol_0_clk = {
> > +       .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_SKIP,
> > +       .clkr = {
> > +               .enable_reg = 0x7501c,
> > +               .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> > +               .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> > +                       .name = "gcc_ufs_card_rx_symbol_0_clk",
> 
> Any reason to not use .fw_name?

Did i understand it correct that you would like these to have .fw_name
for parent? Should we start adding these clocks in DT description?

-- 
~Vinod