[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200427154617.GA1798@pi3>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:46:17 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
"H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Philipp Rossak <embed3d@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
openpvrsgx-devgroup@...ux.org, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org,
kernel@...a-handheld.com, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/12] arm: dts: s5pv210: Add node for SGX 540
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 07:57:12AM -0700, Jonathan Bakker wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 2020-04-26 5:56 a.m., Paul Cercueil wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le ven. 24 avril 2020 à 22:34, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> a écrit :
> >> From: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
> >>
> >> All s5pv210 devices have a PowerVR SGX 540 (revision 120) attached.
> >>
> >> There is no external regulator for it so it can be enabled by default.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
> >> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
> >> index 2ad642f51fd9..abbdda205c1b 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
> >> @@ -512,6 +512,19 @@ vic3: interrupt-controller@...00000 {
> >> #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> >> };
> >>
> >> + gpu: gpu@...00000 {
> >> + compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-sgx540-120";
This should not pass the bindings check because you missed last
compatibles.
> >> + reg = <0xf3000000 0x10000>;
> >> + interrupt-parent = <&vic2>;
> >> + interrupts = <10>;
> >> + clock-names = "core";
> >> + clocks = <&clocks CLK_G3D>;
> >> +
> >> + assigned-clocks = <&clocks MOUT_G3D>, <&clocks DOUT_G3D>;
> >> + assigned-clock-rates = <0>, <66700000>;
> >> + assigned-clock-parents = <&clocks MOUT_MPLL>;
> >
> > What are these clocks for, and why are they reparented / reclocked?
> >
> > Shouldn't they be passed to 'clocks' as well?
> >
> > -Paul
> >
>
> The G3D clock system can have multiple parents, and for stable operation
> it's recommended to use the MPLL clock as the parent (which in turn
> is actually a mux as well). MOUT_G3D is simply the mux for CLK_G3D
> (SGX core clock), DOUT_G3D is the divider. DOUT_G3D could equally be CLK_G3D
> (and probably should be, for readability) as CLK_G3D is simply the gate and
> DOUT_G3D is the divider for it.
Good point, it should be CLK_G3D instead of DOUT. Can you fix this as
well?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists