[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-7876a56a-d387-46f1-9f54-95b18654a571@palmerdabbelt-glaptop1>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To: zong.li@...ive.com
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zong.li@...ive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Refactor patch text interfaces and mechanism
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:29:58 PDT (-0700), zong.li@...ive.com wrote:
> This patch set contains the difference from the newest strict memory
> permission. These changes are suggested by Masami Hiramatsu, including
> deprecating old style of kprobe annotation, lock protection and so on.
>
> Zong Li (3):
> riscv: Remove the 'riscv_' prefix of function name
> riscv: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __krpobes annotation
> riscv: Use text_mutex instead of patch_lock
>
> arch/riscv/include/asm/patch.h | 4 +--
> arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c | 15 ++++++++++-
> arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Thanks, this is on for-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists