[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jhjk120sw60.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:58:15 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
sudeep.holla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/23] sched,psci: Convert to sched_set_fifo*()
On 27/04/20 17:35, Qais Yousef wrote:
>> drv = cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev);
>> @@ -349,11 +347,6 @@ static int suspend_test_thread(void *arg
>> if (atomic_dec_return_relaxed(&nb_active_threads) == 0)
>> complete(&suspend_threads_done);
>>
>> - /* Give up on RT scheduling and wait for termination. */
>> - sched_priority.sched_priority = 0;
>> - if (sched_setscheduler_nocheck(current, SCHED_NORMAL, &sched_priority))
>> - pr_warn("Failed to set suspend thread scheduler on CPU %d\n",
>> - cpu);
>
> No need for sched_set_normal() here before the busy loop?
>
Given the tasks become TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, and the only extra thing they'll
do is exit (barring the parking weirdness), changing them back to CFS
seems superfluous.
> Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists