linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v20 02/17] leds: Add multicolor ID to the color ID list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <003891b8-a697-6d55-3862-5773e23a466a@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:12:18 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:     <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 02/17] leds: Add multicolor ID to the color ID list

Pavel

On 4/25/20 2:52 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2020-04-23 10:55:09, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Add a new color ID that is declared as MULTICOLOR as with the
>> multicolor framework declaring a definitive color is not accurate
>> as the node can contain multiple colors.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
> Please merge with previous patch, and you can keep reviews.

Not sure we should do that.  The previous patches deals directly with 
the bindings and this is code.

I thought the rule was to keep bindings and code separated.

It made sense to squash the bindings header patch to the bindings 
document patch but it does not make sense to squash this patch to the 
bindings.

Please let me know if you want me to proceed with the squash.

Dan