lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <158809055962.24684.286587561551828697.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:15:59 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     mazziesaccount@...il.com,
        Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: bd718x7: remove voltage change restriction from BD71847

On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:29:30 +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> The BD71837 had a HW "feature" where changing the regulator output
> voltages of other regulators but bucks 1-4 might cause spikes if
> regulators were enabled. Thus SW prohibit voltage changes for other
> regulators except for bucks 1-4 when regulator is enabled.
> 
> The HW colleagues did inadvertly fix this issue for BD71847 and
> BD71850. Remove voltage change restrictions from other PMICs but
> BD71837.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-5.8

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: bd718x7: remove voltage change restriction from BD71847
      commit: f0ca7b249c7305c9b9781f7dbcb8d294e0086808

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ