linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 051/131] x86/KVM: Make sure KVM_VCPU_FLUSH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200428182231.389944621@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 20:24:23 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 051/131] x86/KVM: Make sure KVM_VCPU_FLUSH_TLB flag is not missed

From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>

commit b043138246a41064527cf019a3d51d9f015e9796 upstream.

There is a potential race in record_steal_time() between setting
host-local vcpu->arch.st.steal.preempted to zero (i.e. clearing
KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED) and propagating this value to the guest with
kvm_write_guest_cached(). Between those two events the guest may
still see KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED in its copy of kvm_steal_time, set
KVM_VCPU_FLUSH_TLB and assume that hypervisor will do the right
thing. Which it won't.

Instad of copying, we should map kvm_steal_time and that will
guarantee atomicity of accesses to @preempted.

This is part of CVE-2019-3016.

Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
[bwh: Backported to 4.19: No tracepoint in record_steal_time().]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 6916f46909ab0..d77822e03ff6b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2397,43 +2397,45 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool invalidate_gpa)
 
 static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	struct kvm_host_map map;
+	struct kvm_steal_time *st;
+
 	if (!(vcpu->arch.st.msr_val & KVM_MSR_ENABLED))
 		return;
 
-	if (unlikely(kvm_read_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.st.stime,
-		&vcpu->arch.st.steal, sizeof(struct kvm_steal_time))))
+	/* -EAGAIN is returned in atomic context so we can just return. */
+	if (kvm_map_gfn(vcpu, vcpu->arch.st.msr_val >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+			&map, &vcpu->arch.st.cache, false))
 		return;
 
+	st = map.hva +
+		offset_in_page(vcpu->arch.st.msr_val & KVM_STEAL_VALID_BITS);
+
 	/*
 	 * Doing a TLB flush here, on the guest's behalf, can avoid
 	 * expensive IPIs.
 	 */
-	if (xchg(&vcpu->arch.st.steal.preempted, 0) & KVM_VCPU_FLUSH_TLB)
+	if (xchg(&st->preempted, 0) & KVM_VCPU_FLUSH_TLB)
 		kvm_vcpu_flush_tlb(vcpu, false);
 
-	if (vcpu->arch.st.steal.version & 1)
-		vcpu->arch.st.steal.version += 1;  /* first time write, random junk */
+	vcpu->arch.st.steal.preempted = 0;
 
-	vcpu->arch.st.steal.version += 1;
+	if (st->version & 1)
+		st->version += 1;  /* first time write, random junk */
 
-	kvm_write_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.st.stime,
-		&vcpu->arch.st.steal, sizeof(struct kvm_steal_time));
+	st->version += 1;
 
 	smp_wmb();
 
-	vcpu->arch.st.steal.steal += current->sched_info.run_delay -
+	st->steal += current->sched_info.run_delay -
 		vcpu->arch.st.last_steal;
 	vcpu->arch.st.last_steal = current->sched_info.run_delay;
 
-	kvm_write_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.st.stime,
-		&vcpu->arch.st.steal, sizeof(struct kvm_steal_time));
-
 	smp_wmb();
 
-	vcpu->arch.st.steal.version += 1;
+	st->version += 1;
 
-	kvm_write_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.st.stime,
-		&vcpu->arch.st.steal, sizeof(struct kvm_steal_time));
+	kvm_unmap_gfn(vcpu, &map, &vcpu->arch.st.cache, true, false);
 }
 
 int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
@@ -3272,18 +3274,25 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
 
 static void kvm_steal_time_set_preempted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	struct kvm_host_map map;
+	struct kvm_steal_time *st;
+
 	if (!(vcpu->arch.st.msr_val & KVM_MSR_ENABLED))
 		return;
 
 	if (vcpu->arch.st.steal.preempted)
 		return;
 
-	vcpu->arch.st.steal.preempted = KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED;
+	if (kvm_map_gfn(vcpu, vcpu->arch.st.msr_val >> PAGE_SHIFT, &map,
+			&vcpu->arch.st.cache, true))
+		return;
+
+	st = map.hva +
+		offset_in_page(vcpu->arch.st.msr_val & KVM_STEAL_VALID_BITS);
+
+	st->preempted = vcpu->arch.st.steal.preempted = KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED;
 
-	kvm_write_guest_offset_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.st.stime,
-			&vcpu->arch.st.steal.preempted,
-			offsetof(struct kvm_steal_time, preempted),
-			sizeof(vcpu->arch.st.steal.preempted));
+	kvm_unmap_gfn(vcpu, &map, &vcpu->arch.st.cache, true, true);
 }
 
 void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-- 
2.20.1