[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200428182243.459800577@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 20:24:22 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Lary Gibaud <yarl-baudig@...loo.org>,
Stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 088/168] iio: st_sensors: rely on odr mask to know if odr can be set
From: Lary Gibaud <yarl-baudig@...loo.org>
commit e450e07c14abae563ad13b064cbce9fdccc6bc8d upstream.
Indeed, relying on addr being not 0 cannot work because some device have
their register to set odr at address 0. As a matter of fact, if the odr
can be set, then there is a mask.
Sensors with ODR register at address 0 are: lsm303dlh, lsm303dlhc, lsm303dlm
Fixes: 7d245172675a ("iio: common: st_sensors: check odr address value in st_sensors_set_odr()")
Signed-off-by: Lary Gibaud <yarl-baudig@...loo.org>
Cc: <Stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ int st_sensors_set_odr(struct iio_dev *i
struct st_sensor_odr_avl odr_out = {0, 0};
struct st_sensor_data *sdata = iio_priv(indio_dev);
- if (!sdata->sensor_settings->odr.addr)
+ if (!sdata->sensor_settings->odr.mask)
return 0;
err = st_sensors_match_odr(sdata->sensor_settings, odr, &odr_out);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists