linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 135/168] powerpc/setup_64: Set cache-line-size based on cache-block-size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200428182249.013948869@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 20:25:09 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
        Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 135/168] powerpc/setup_64: Set cache-line-size based on cache-block-size

From: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>

commit 94c0b013c98583614e1ad911e8795ca36da34a85 upstream.

If {i,d}-cache-block-size is set and {i,d}-cache-line-size is not, use
the block-size value for both. Per the devicetree spec cache-line-size
is only needed if it differs from the block size.

Originally the code would fallback from block size to line size. An
error message was printed if both properties were missing.

Later the code was refactored to use clearer names and logic but it
inadvertently made line size a required property, meaning on systems
without a line size property we fall back to the default from the
cputable.

On powernv (OPAL) platforms, since the introduction of device tree CPU
features (5a61ef74f269 ("powerpc/64s: Support new device tree binding
for discovering CPU features")), that has led to the wrong value being
used, as the fallback value is incorrect for Power8/Power9 CPUs.

The incorrect values flow through to the VDSO and also to the sysconf
values, SC_LEVEL1_ICACHE_LINESIZE etc.

Fixes: bd067f83b084 ("powerpc/64: Fix naming of cache block vs. cache line")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.11+
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
[mpe: Add even more detail to change log]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200416221908.7886-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
@@ -541,6 +541,8 @@ static bool __init parse_cache_info(stru
 	lsizep = of_get_property(np, propnames[3], NULL);
 	if (bsizep == NULL)
 		bsizep = lsizep;
+	if (lsizep == NULL)
+		lsizep = bsizep;
 	if (lsizep != NULL)
 		lsize = be32_to_cpu(*lsizep);
 	if (bsizep != NULL)