[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200428190306.GM2014@kadam>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:03:06 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
Cc: Suraj Upadhyay <usuraj35@...il.com>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] staging: wfx: cleanup long lines in data_tx.c
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:50:23AM +0000, Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> On Saturday 25 April 2020 13:32:34 CEST Suraj Upadhyay wrote:
> > Break lines with length over 80 characters to
> > conform to the linux coding style and refactor
> > wherever necessary.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Suraj Upadhyay <usuraj35@...il.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Added a space after declaration in wfx_get_hw_rate().
> > - A checkpatch warning for this commit is retained at line 75,
> > to maintain uniformity in function declarations. (Reviewer
> > jerome suggested).
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Changed the temporary variable name for the memzcmp statement
> > to is_used. (as suggested).
> > - Added a temporary ieee80211_supported_band variable to address
> > the problem in wfx_get_hw_rate() more efficiently. (not
> > suggested, but still).
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Introduced a temporary variable for the memzcmp statement.
> > - Addressed the checkpatch problem with wfx_get_hw_rate().
> > - Restored the function definition of wfx_tx_get_tx_parms
> > as suggested by the reviewer.
> > - Added suggested changes for req->packet_id statement.
> >
> > drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> This patch does not contain the suggestions from Dan. However, it is
> sufficient from my personal point of view.
Yeah. It's fine. It wasn't 100% cut and paste from my suggestions but
it did address the stuff I cared about. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists