| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:58:40 +0200
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>,
bigeasy@...utronix.de
Subject: [PATCH 01/24] rcu/tree: Keep kfree_rcu() awake during lock contention
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
On PREEMPT_RT kernels, contending on the krcp spinlock can cause
sleeping as on these kernels, the spinlock is converted to an rt-mutex.
To prevent breakage of possible usage of kfree_rcu() now or in the
future, make use of raw spinlocks which are not subject to such
conversions.
Vetting all code paths, there is no reason to believe that the raw
spinlock will be held for long time so PREEMPT_RT should not suffer from
lengthy acquirals of the lock.
Cc: bigeasy@...utronix.de
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index f288477ee1c2..cf68d3d9f5b8 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2905,7 +2905,7 @@ struct kfree_rcu_cpu {
struct kfree_rcu_bulk_data *bhead;
struct kfree_rcu_bulk_data *bcached;
struct kfree_rcu_cpu_work krw_arr[KFREE_N_BATCHES];
- spinlock_t lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
struct delayed_work monitor_work;
bool monitor_todo;
bool initialized;
@@ -2939,12 +2939,12 @@ static void kfree_rcu_work(struct work_struct *work)
krwp = container_of(to_rcu_work(work),
struct kfree_rcu_cpu_work, rcu_work);
krcp = krwp->krcp;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
head = krwp->head_free;
krwp->head_free = NULL;
bhead = krwp->bhead_free;
krwp->bhead_free = NULL;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
/* "bhead" is now private, so traverse locklessly. */
for (; bhead; bhead = bnext) {
@@ -3047,14 +3047,14 @@ static inline void kfree_rcu_drain_unlock(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp,
krcp->monitor_todo = false;
if (queue_kfree_rcu_work(krcp)) {
// Success! Our job is done here.
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
return;
}
// Previous RCU batch still in progress, try again later.
krcp->monitor_todo = true;
schedule_delayed_work(&krcp->monitor_work, KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
}
/*
@@ -3067,11 +3067,11 @@ static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp = container_of(work, struct kfree_rcu_cpu,
monitor_work.work);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
if (krcp->monitor_todo)
kfree_rcu_drain_unlock(krcp, flags);
else
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
}
static inline bool
@@ -3142,7 +3142,7 @@ void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
local_irq_save(flags); // For safely calling this_cpu_ptr().
krcp = this_cpu_ptr(&krc);
if (krcp->initialized)
- spin_lock(&krcp->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&krcp->lock);
// Queue the object but don't yet schedule the batch.
if (debug_rcu_head_queue(head)) {
@@ -3173,7 +3173,7 @@ void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
unlock_return:
if (krcp->initialized)
- spin_unlock(&krcp->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&krcp->lock);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kfree_call_rcu);
@@ -3205,11 +3205,11 @@ kfree_rcu_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp = per_cpu_ptr(&krc, cpu);
count = krcp->count;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
if (krcp->monitor_todo)
kfree_rcu_drain_unlock(krcp, flags);
else
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
sc->nr_to_scan -= count;
freed += count;
@@ -3236,15 +3236,15 @@ void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void)
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp = per_cpu_ptr(&krc, cpu);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
if (!krcp->head || krcp->monitor_todo) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
continue;
}
krcp->monitor_todo = true;
schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &krcp->monitor_work,
KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
}
}
@@ -4140,7 +4140,7 @@ static void __init kfree_rcu_batch_init(void)
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp = per_cpu_ptr(&krc, cpu);
- spin_lock_init(&krcp->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&krcp->lock);
for (i = 0; i < KFREE_N_BATCHES; i++) {
INIT_RCU_WORK(&krcp->krw_arr[i].rcu_work, kfree_rcu_work);
krcp->krw_arr[i].krcp = krcp;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists