[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200428211922.GA874567@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:19:22 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>, acme@...nel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Fix uncore event mixed metric with workload
error issue
> I wonder this would break some expectations.. would it be
> more safe to detect duration event and bypass it from the
> decission? but maybe the case I'm worried about is not a
> problem at all.. Andi?
Don't see what it would break.
Yes maybe we need to special case duration_time more, but that would
be a much bigger patch.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists