linux-kernel - RE: next/master bisection: baseline.dmesg.alert on imx8mn-ddr4-evk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 05:54:18 +0000
From:   Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>
CC:     "kernelci@...ups.io" <kernelci@...ups.io>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: next/master bisection: baseline.dmesg.alert on imx8mn-ddr4-evk

> Subject: Re: next/master bisection: baseline.dmesg.alert on
> imx8mn-ddr4-evk
> 
> On 27-04-20, 14:00, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> > Please see the bisection report below about a boot failure.
> >
> > Reports aren't automatically sent to the public while we're trialing
> > new bisection features on kernelci.org but this one looks valid.
> 
> @Peng: I have dropped your patch now, please resend it once you have fixed
> the issue.

Sorry, I used an old base for the patch, the cpu_dev should be applied before
check cpu-supply property.

        if (!of_find_property(cpu_dev->of_node, "cpu-supply", NULL))
                return -ENODEV;

        cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0);  --> put before the upper code.

I'll post new version.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> --
> viresh