linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:33:29 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:01:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c: In function 'controlfb_mmap':
> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c:756:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'pgprot_cached_wthru'; did you mean 'pgprot_cached'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   756 |   vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_cached_wthru(vma->vm_page_prot);
>       |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                       pgprot_cached
> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c:756:23: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'pgprot_t' {aka 'struct <anonymous>'} from type 'int'
> 
> Presumably exposed by commit
> 
>   a07a63b0e24d ("video: fbdev: controlfb: add COMPILE_TEST support")
> 
> I just turned off COMPILE_TEST again for today.  Please let me know when
> this is fixed.

This still appears to have not been addressed.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped