lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bba0dd4b-6f38-84e0-ffbf-fbf4243b6c43@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:37:20 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To:     David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, oom: stop reclaiming if GFP_ATOMIC will start failing
 soon

On 2020/04/29 6:48, David Rientjes wrote:
> Somewhat related to what I described in the changelog: we lost the "page 
> allocation stalls" artifacts in the kernel log for 4.15.  The commit 
> description references an asynchronous mechanism for getting this 
> information; I don't know where this mechanism currently lives.

The asynchronous mechanism I meant in that commit is
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c9c87635-6e00-5ce7-b05a-966011c8fe3f@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp .
We are still forced to live in a world where we cannot get a clue for stalled allocations. :-(

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ