[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200428164819.7b58666b755d2156aa46c56c@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:48:19 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
andres@...razel.de, willy@...radead.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
hch@...radead.org, jack@...e.cz, david@...morbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND 0/2] vfs: have syncfs() return error when
there are writeback errors
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:51:53 -0400 Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
> Just a resend since this hasn't been picked up yet. No real changes
> from the last set (other than adding Jan's Reviewed-bys). Latest
> cover letter follows:
I see no cover letter here.
>
> --------------------------8<----------------------------
>
> v6:
> - use READ_ONCE to ensure that compiler doesn't optimize away local var
>
> The only difference from v5 is the change to use READ_ONCE to fetch the
> bd_super pointer, to ensure that the compiler doesn't refetch it
> afterward. Many thanks to Jan K. for the explanation!
>
> Jeff Layton (2):
> vfs: track per-sb writeback errors and report them to syncfs
> buffer: record blockdev write errors in super_block that it backs
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200207170423.377931-1-jlayton@kernel.org
has suitable-looking words, but is it up to date?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists