[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa31bc42-d34c-c788-0109-350d769b51ce@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:02:42 +0530
From: kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
To: acme@...nel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, jmario@...hat.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...nel.org,
paulus@...abs.org, namhyung@...nel.org, mpetlan@...hat.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mamatha4@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mark.rutland@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] powerpc/perf: Add json file metric support for the
hv_24x7 socket/chip level events
Hi Arnaldo,
Please let me know if there any changes required in this patchset,
as some of its patches are still not part of your perf/core tree.
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
On 4/2/20 2:03 AM, Kajol Jain wrote:
> Patchset adds json file metric support for the hv_24x7 socket/chip level
> events. "hv_24x7" pmu interface events needs system dependent parameter
> like socket/chip/core. For example, hv_24x7 chip level events needs
> specific chip-id to which the data is requested should be added as part
> of pmu events.
>
> So to enable JSON file support to "hv_24x7" interface, patchset reads
> total number of sockets details in sysfs under
> "/sys/devices/hv_24x7/interface/".
>
> Second patch of the patchset adds expr_scanner_ctx object to hold user
> data for the expr scanner, which can be used to hold runtime parameter.
>
> Patch 4 & 6 of the patchset handles perf tool plumbing needed to replace
> the "?" character in the metric expression to proper value and hv_24x7
> json metric file for different Socket/chip resources.
>
> Patch set also enable Hz/hz prinitg for --metric-only option to print
> metric data for bus frequency.
>
> Applied and tested all these patches cleanly on top of jiri's flex changes
> with the changes done by Kan Liang for "Support metric group constraint"
> patchset and made required changes.
>
> Also apply this patch on top of the fix patch send earlier
> for printing metric name incase overlapping events.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=37cd7f65bf71a48f25eeb6d9be5dacb20d008ea6
>
> Changelog:
> v7 -> v8
> - Add test case for testing parsing of "?" in metric expression
> - Reaname variables name to runtime
>
> v6 -> v7
> - Spit patchset into two patch series one for kernel changes and other
> for tool side changes.
> - Made changes Suggested by Jiri, including rather then reading runtime
> parameter from metric name, actually add it in structure egroup and
> metric_expr.
> - As we don't need to read runtime parameter from metric name,
> now I am not appending it and rather just printing it in
> generic_metric function.
>
> Kernel Side changes patch series: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/27/58
>
> v5 -> v6
> - resolve compilation issue due to rearranging patch series.
> - Rather then adding new function to take careof case for runtime param
> in metricgroup__add_metric, using metricgroup__add_metric_param itself
> for that work.
> - Address some optimization suggested like using directly file path
> rather then adding new macro in header.c
> - Change commit message on patch where we are adding "?" support
> by adding simple example.
>
> v4 -> v5
> - Using sysfs__read_int instead of sysfs__read_ull while reading
> parameter value in powerpc/util/header.c file.
>
> - Using asprintf rather then malloc and sprintf
> Suggested by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>
> - Break patch 6 from previous version to two patch,
> - One to add refactor current "metricgroup__add_metric" function
> and another where actually "?" handling infra added.
>
> - Add expr__runtimeparam as part of 'expr_scanner_ctx' struct
> rather then making it global variable. Thanks Jiri for
> adding this structure to hold user data for the expr scanner.
>
> - Add runtime param as agrugement to function 'expr__find_other'
> and 'expr__parse' and made changes on references accordingly.
>
> v3 -> v4
> - Apply these patch on top of Kan liang changes.
> As suggested by Jiri.
>
> v2 -> v3
> - Remove setting event_count to 0 part in function 'h_24x7_event_read'
> with comment rather then adding 0 to event_count value.
> Suggested by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
>
> - Apply tool side changes require to replace "?" on Jiri's flex patch
> series and made all require changes to make it compatible with added
> flex change.
>
> v1 -> v2
> - Rename hv-24x7 metric json file as nest_metrics.json
>
> Jiri Olsa (2):
> perf expr: Add expr_ prefix for parse_ctx and parse_id
> perf expr: Add expr_scanner_ctx object
>
> Kajol Jain (5):
> perf/tools: Refactoring metricgroup__add_metric function
> perf/tools: Enhance JSON/metric infrastructure to handle "?"
> perf/tests/expr: Added test for runtime param in metric expression
> tools/perf: Enable Hz/hz prinitg for --metric-only option
> perf/tools/pmu-events/powerpc: Add hv_24x7 socket/chip level metric
> events
>
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c | 8 ++
> .../arch/powerpc/power9/nest_metrics.json | 19 +++++
> tools/perf/tests/expr.c | 20 +++--
> tools/perf/util/expr.c | 25 +++---
> tools/perf/util/expr.h | 19 +++--
> tools/perf/util/expr.l | 37 ++++++---
> tools/perf/util/expr.y | 6 +-
> tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c | 78 +++++++++++++------
> tools/perf/util/metricgroup.h | 2 +
> tools/perf/util/stat-display.c | 2 -
> tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c | 19 +++--
> 11 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power9/nest_metrics.json
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists