[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200428063935.GA5660@laniakea>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:39:35 +0200
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] ptrace, pidfd: add pidfd_ptrace syscall
* Linus Torvalds | 2020-04-27 21:28:14 [-0700]:
>> I hate to say this, but I’m not convinced that asking the gdb folks is
>> the right approach. GDB has an ancient architecture and is
>> *incredibly* buggy. I’m sure ptrace is somewhere on the pain point
>> list, but I suspect it’s utterly dwarfed by everything else.
>
>You may be right. However, if gdbn isn't going to use it, then I
>seriously don't think it's worth changing much.
>
>It might be worth looking at people who don't use ptrace() for
>debugging, but for "incidental" reasons. IOW sandboxing, tracing,
>things like that.
>
>Maybe those people want things that are simpler and don't actually
>need the kinds of hard serialization that ptrace() wants.
>
>I'd rather add a few really simple things that might not be a full
>complement of operations for a debugger, but exactly because they
>aren't a full debugger, maybe they are things that we can tell are
>obviously secure and simple?
Okay, to sum up the the whole discussion: we go forward with Jann's proposal
by simple adding PTRACE_ATTACH_PIDFD and friends. This is the minimal invasive
solution and the risk of an potenial security problem is almost not present[TM].
Changing the whole ptrace API is a different beast. I rather believe that I
see Linus Linux successor rather than a ptrace successor.
I am fine with PTRACE_ATTACH_PIDFD!
Hagen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists